Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Based on the screenshots and the comments made by both parties (conjecture) we can conclude that there was an agreement for 2 earrings at 20k. One party is requesting 10k for 1 earring while the other contends that they will pay 20k when 2 earrings are delivered.
Since this agreement (and contracts) is based around performance I would conclude that amending the agreement (as it was stated and not written) is something that should be easy to remedy. As one earring has been delivered and it represents half of the total expected delivery.
If the agreement concluded or was terminated the other party would still be expected to pay the 10k as one earring was already provided.
The alternative is to return the earring since the material object still exists.
|
Lol...I know we talk about lawyer questing things but damn, he does it well.