Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedmelon
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
enter quantum convictions....
*fires up eerie midi*
|
just wanted to clarify what I meant by this, because I realized my meaning may have been too ambiguous. was just alluding to the fact that for the proposition to be true, it'd have to be false, so you have true and false at once! ^o^