Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sorry, wasn't trying to "upstage you", but you buried the lead in that thread so I didn't think this had been posted yet.
Daybreak flat out said that the agreement was to limit when P99 released servers. Basic logic dictates that if they wanted to prevent new servers from being released, they'd say that. But clearly in that quote they don't: they say they're cool with P99, and all they care about is that P99 doesn't time server releases to conflict with their server releases.
Sure it's technically possible they just failed to mention that or lied about it ... but again normal/rational people wouldn't talk about the agreement like that while not mentioning or hiding a secret clause preventing new P99 servers.
And of course, long before this article there's always been the basic logic that "The entire point of Project 1999 is to create a true classic (ie. Green) server, and the P99 admins would never have entered into an agreement which thwarted the project's central purpose". This just gives official proof from Daybreak about what their motives are and why they entered into the agreement.
But look, I've been on these forums for a long time. I'm 100% sure that neither this nor any other proof will be enough for some people. Hell, I guarantee there would be people who would wig out about conspiracies even if there was video evidence of the Daybreak people and Rogean personally signing a contract, and the entire contract was captured on video.
|
why would they admit to being party poopers when they can just play up their friendliness with the community and nobody can say shit contrary cuz NDA.
of course I am arguing frivolously, imagining a paradigm where the case is not that new servers are halted because churn complicates the administration of [REDACTED] and devalues [REDACTED]