I'm saying that 100% of people agreeing to roll because that's what WE'VE told them to do is different than people agreeing that shady should be handled by a roll. The people who want to click have made great compromises and concessions for the people that want to roll so that the pro-roll crowd can do shady as they want. Mostly because they were bullied into doing so by some of the people there, including me at one point. I'm ashamed that I used such tactics to try and bring people over to my side of thinking. There's a different between agreeing with someone and just going along with someone.
People, like agreements, should be flexible and should be allowed to change when presented with new/more/different ideas or opinions. We shouldn't be so rigid that seven instances of something that will happen hundreds or thousands of times over the life of the server should set the standard for everyone to follow.
If we who want to roll are not willing to make some of those exact same compromises how can be claim to be any better than they are? If we are to be champions for the people, should we not be champions for ALL of the people? Even when our views differ from theirs?
|