Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Queue
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's a great way of putting it. In my case, the answer is yes. I'm okay with being less efficient as long as the difference isn't huge. My main concern was whether the difference for shaman was as dramatic as the difference between Iksar and other races for necromancer. I think this thread has convinced me that the difference is not insignificant, but it is nowhere near as big a deal for shaman. Given far easier access to regen items and regen spells for shaman, this makes perfect sense.
Thanks again for all the replies. Great info here.
|
Wow I disagree a lot with what’s being said in this thread.
I think at 60 the racial difference for necro won’t account for much more of an effective necro whether you’re iksar or not. I think the difference is much bigger on shaman and actually can make a difference in a lot of places.
Regen is always a big deal. Even at 60 after you have torpor. If nothing else, it’s such an awesome quality of life thing to get away from torpor after torpor after torpor.
Judging by this thread and what people say I’d judge ogre the worst shaman class but I think the FSI is invaluable. I’m also jealous and wish I had some of the troll perks of extra regen and snare. That stuff matters and I would really enjoy having it. Compared to my dark elf necro... with level 60 lich and life taps, I’m not really missing racial regen.