Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, Macken fails at structuring a question...
/facepalm
Should read, for the answer he wants anyway, which server was the most hardcore / extreme... In which case it should be Sullon > Rallos... maybe.
Now that I think about it, toughest to play might have been evil team Vallon / Tallon... it was 9v1 for most of us. Non stop fighting alliance everywhere you went. But between Nek and Grobb there werent many alliance, so we usually ran Guk...
I dunno, Rallos being the original makes me think it was the toughest to play. Learning content + pvp = hard...
I dunno, tough call, FFA or 2v1? Thats the question imo.
|
I'm sorry you and Doors got caught in my troll net. But facts are facts. The poll question could have been structured in any number of ways for SZ to win.
I just arbitrarily chose the words i did.
The whole poll is a troll. Everyone knows SZ was the top server to play. This is only a poll to pass the time until red99 is released, and to identify anyone claiming their server was harder, tougher, more hard-core, more red etc...and then to make alot of fun of them.
Personally i lump anyone claiming SZ was not THE SERVER TO PLAY as someone who has the potential to not be honest with themselves or others and unrealistic or biased towards themselves in the face of overwhelming facts.... for future considerations in any other discussions