J, we're in agreement, at least causually, dont answer the question for them.
How did native american cultures have a disparity in some tribesmen having multiple wives, and others having to accept a relegated role of transvestism if women gravitating toward the men demonstrating social and or physical apex characteristics is a product of capitalist society?
Capitalism was a completely foreign concept to these almost entirely communal tribes. How does marxist theory account for this anomaly?
In response to your last sentence, J, what makes you think true Artificial Intelligence would side with Marxist theory? The theory, itself, is absolutely riddled with contradictions.
How would the AI establish "equality" when some people are more compulsive and wasteful than others? Why would AI side with the more wasteful, compulsive sects? That would go against the efficiency imperative, would it not?
It seems to me, anyone claiming to be a Marxist AND a critical thinker, must abandon Marxist theory, because it fails the critical analysis all over the place. So much for the smart ones, angle. I think it more aptly fits the "retarded ones" angle, with "smart ones" lumped into it merely as a means of undeservedly taking from others what they've failed to earn for themselves (be it POWER, MONEY, or Social Prestige).
|