View Single Post
  #122  
Old 04-28-2011, 11:08 AM
Brain Brain is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 294
Default

Evidence? Memory is evidence bonehead, unfortunately it's not accepted here. (Unless you're a dev!)

I want to know what prompted this change/nerf in the first place?? Obviously you guys don't have any "legitimate" classic evidence regarding charm so why change it? Perhaps it was the crying about how enchanters were OP'd?! Or did you guys just "feel" it was OP'd based purely on your opinion? Really? Please tell me why it was changed. Maybe pre-nerf charm coding WASN'T classic so ya'll felt the need to change it, based on no real data, to make it "feel" more classic...

In any case, I think the dev's are a bit hypocritical atm (from an evidence-required-for-change standpoint) - it did not "balance" charm in any way, and with the extremely high mana cost associated with each cast, charming has become utterly useless.

Who are YOU to classify something as being overpowered?