[maskedmelon]

that makes sense ^^ I thought about refactoring that whole method because I'm sure there's got to be a more direct way to do what im doing there. I'd considered peeling the one repeated item into its own method, but left it since it was one line of code repeated once. Of course if I introduce additional parameters or dump the try-catch block, I think I will roll into all into its own method. Im gonna remember that acronym ^^ I liek it ^^