[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it is more interesting than that. Protecting children are a visceral response of most people, but it is necessarily moral under all circumstances. For example, if you are the sole provider of your children and starve because you give all the food to them, then they will die too. If however, you starve one, then you may continue to provide for the other. sounds fricken awful, but refusing to be that heartless piece of suit means you all die, making you a dead selfish piece of shit :c

Why have kids if you’re starving? Why have kids if you don’t have $500000 in cash? That’s how much it costs to raise one. Hope this helps