Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I dont know what you think the experience on Tallon was like, but there was more than ample training. I used to log on Wynch and bring VS to the entrance groups. For hours.
The point is this, unenforceable rules work less well than no rules.
Who is to "define" training? What EQ PvP does not include a NPC at some point? Who pops their fraps key and comes to the forums first? When does the first cry of favoritism happen after a suspect ban? Who makes those judgement calls? What about the first time someone realizes they aggro'd the mob they are fraps'ing and posting as a train? Do they get banned out of stupidity? Do bans / trains get defined by forums faggots and a vote? Lol
Hate to break it to you clowns, but Sullon was not some bastion of hardcore gamers, it simply the drainage of all the trash from Tallon / Rallos / Vallon. I was a shitbag on Tallon, but when I asked for LnS, it was always granted. Because they were happy to get rid of me, and they KNEW I was done at that point.
Dunno, maybe all the decent players are gone and R99 will need its hand held by a never ended and rotating supply of CS GMs. I can promise you, Sirken will not be there for 4 years to wipe your asses for you.
|
Voodoo, is that you brew?
Honestly, rules of questionable enforceability are better than no rules, and here's why: the no rules experiment was tried on VZTZ. It failed spectacularly, and people cried for the rules back after a few days of trains and people being unable to get pixels.
At least w/ the threat of bans/suspensions for training, hacking etc there will be some kind of deterrent mechanism whereby people will lose their characters if they consistently do bad shit. Sure, fraps of trains are judgment calls, but it's better than nothing.