Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, it is. First of all, that experiment is trash. It proves correlation, not causation -- and the wide-ranging conclusions drawn from an over-simplified experiment are absurd. You might as well conclude that liberals, on average, are more literate; or have more agile and dexterous fingers.
|
Wouldn't be that far fetched, but we're not here to make up correlations based on the study.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The irony is that the attempt at identifying implications from the experiment proves why it's worthless. The experiment could provide scientific explanation for Bush's single-mindedness and Kerry being a flip-flopper? There's the problem. Is being single-minded a bad thing? Is being a flip-flopper a bad thing? It's entirely circumstantial. Single-mindedness is referred to as dedication and determination under the right circumstances. But if you're the Red Baron, it's referred to as "target fixation". That'd be the wrong circumstance. Flip-flopping can be open-mindedness. It can also be whimsicality and lack of conviction.
|
That's exactly a point the study itself brought up. I don't see why you're reiterating it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Everything is fluid. Liberal isn't better. Conservative isn't better. They're two overarching belief systems that each have proven to be correct and incorrect time and time again.
|
"Analyzing the data, Sulloway said liberals were 4.9 times as likely as conservatives to show activity in the brain circuits that deal with conflicts, and 2.2 times as likely to score in the top half of the distribution for accuracy."
Better. More testing is needed. For science!