Quote:
Originally Posted by Para99
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any idea what this means?
If evidence can't be found to support it being 25%, it'd be better to have a 1% chance for 4 ticks until evidence is found supporting 25% instead of the version we have now.
|
Formula schenanigans aside (some of the conversation earlier in this thread is above my head), the chance to blur each tic at 25% makes a lot of sense to me. It will result in a roughly 70% chance to blur, but you lose control of the timing of the blur, and its far from a sure thing. If you mean something else, please do clarify. A 1% chance is so small that even over 4 tics it’s unlikely anyone would have ever found this useful.