View Single Post
  #8  
Old 04-19-2011, 04:17 PM
Coril Coril is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caravelle1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I agree with the agro part, I was in a crypt group, I was testing to see when I could tash. at 70% if I tashed, the mob would run at me, stay agroed on me till about 60%, then I couldnt sit or cast a DD on the mob or it came back at me, this was with a level 54 warrior tanking
True.

The reason that charm felt more "okay" to me in terms of sheer enchanter balance was because Spell Aggro in general on p99 is much, much worse than it was in live.

Mez agro, tash agro, and aoe stun aggro is so high that to use them is just to abandon the hopes of tank regetting aggro for significant time. God help you if you tash, mezz, and slow a mob. That was my habit during live, and during kunark era I remember I would get hit a little for the trouble, but tanks would grab aggro pretty quick. Now? It's rather a joke.

I think that if spell aggro in general were reduced, the frustration of the non-charming enchanter group role would be greatly improved. For both the enchanter and the tank.