Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well, I'm not sure the burden of proof works that way. However, the evidence for Trak being a 3-day spawn is marginally more compelling than no evidence at all, so I guess it should be changed. Still I would hope that, in the future, people don't put too much stake in DKP records as evidence for this kind of stuff. I don't find it very reliable (for reasons that still haven't been fully addressed), but as you said, no one's given evidence beyond their own recollections that Trak was a 7-day spawn, so I'd be silly if I said the evidence favored Trak being a 7-day spawn.
|
Seriously? Are you just trolling at this point? All the pieces of evidence, including people who killed him posting here that he was a 3 day sapwn. There is not a single piece of evidence anyone has posted that he's a 7 day spawn, or that he was a 7 day spawn ever and was changed to a 3 day spawn without it being in patch notes.
Why does the burden of proof lay on the people providing evidence to defend a point that is uncontested? Has a single person who raided in kunark said they remember trak as a 7 day spawn?
FWIW the most compelling evidence is on LOS updates as it's almost daily and you can tell which were patch day / server up or down days by what is in the update and what they killed