Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaanka
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[sassy black trump-lady gif]
WRONG!
pretty much any economic system cant survive mass immigration and socialists displacing the country's actual residents with the desire to subvert and end their economic system.
capitalism is actually the only economic system post feudalism which has had any long term success.
i believe you're wrongly ascribing all of the failures of the west to capitalism,
which i should remind you despite its shortcomings is still currently the most successful group of societies in the world right now and responsible for just about every single thing that makes your life better which you enjoy on a daily basis.
here's my question for you: what about muslim countries do you think makes them accept slavery, spousal domestic violence, public torture and killing of rape victims and homosexuals, genital mutilation of babies, child rape, child marriage and beastiality? their economic systems?
here's my other question for you: why does socialism always end in slavery starvation and subjugation? like i get it if your ultimate goal is to lower the human pop. i might even not say that's such a bad thing, if they would own it.
|
Socialism as in what? What they did in Sweden? Besides the immigration fuck up -- which they are correcting -- Sweden is fine. But Sweden is also capitalist in the context of the USSR vs the West.
If you mean socialist as in China and Russia? there was a lot of reason any government there would have killed lots of people, communist or not...You haven't even used the best example of horrible communist government, Pol Pot -- In his case, he was worse than any other kind of government Cambodia could have adopted. But in China? It was even worse when Capitalists were in charge. Same with Russia for the most part...Stalin did do some next level killing -- but he also made huge gains in science and industry. That was kind of how the era worked. Roosevelt oversaw the death of many American soldiers so he could go planting the flag for future generations. Lot's of questionable behavior to go around in this era, few faced with the problems Stalin was. It's hard to say if he was certainly worse than a capitalist government would have been.
Communism did not just spread death and destruction. It played a huge rolls of making these countries important. The one that has fully abandoned communism is doing worse from what I can tell, despite having a better start under Stalin than China under Mao. There is still widespread death and corruption in Russia -- just not to the scale of the Great War era of the world.
To accuse the kind of socialism I am proposing to America, as something likely to lead to death and destruction is laughable. I'm saying lets be more like Denmark, not Russia during the USSR era.
Wholesale immigration is a problem with some socialist platforms, but I honestly think they have learned from negative experiences...especially immigrating Muslims.