Quote:
Originally Posted by Teppler
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's the same logic you are using against Locke for having slaves.
|
Locke argued that it was perfectly moral to have slaves because they have no rights after surrendering in battle (dubious claim that all slaves surrendered in battle right there).
What does that have to do with the argument that Socialized medicine is better for the host country than a (mostly) capitalist healthcare system?