Quote:
Originally Posted by skarlorn
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i haven't followed this outside of this thread but i don't think it's about him being brown. i think it's about the fact that she was trying to destroy his career because she didn't have a fun sexual experience, and the current platform allowed her to practically libel him with the insinuation that he sexually abused her.
fucking weebs
|
the left has had absolutely no issue with destroying many men's careers over shaky sexual abuse allegations though. they've done it without remorse for a very long time to very many people, even predating #metoo.. i'm trying to figure out why they suddenly care and take moral opposition to giving women the power to do this, but only in this one circumstance. the only conclusions i can come to is either because he's brown, or because they really like parks and recreation.
obviously any sane normal person has the same reaction you did, i'm not talking about sane people i mean people who tolerate feminism. i'm wondering why they're acting sanely and reasonably for once. neither of which are particularly hallmarks of the progressive-left.
i think it's actually about parks and recreation in retrospect, and after reading a lot of posts on reddit about it. i have never heard any opposition to what they did to Herman Cain the week he polled ahead of boyking Obama, and he was black. but maybe that was simply outweighed by him being a conservative republican? i'm still trying to understand the progressive stack, do you still keep your black victim points if you don't lock-step follow their ideology?