Quote:
Originally Posted by Raavak
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also to regulate Interstate Commerce, but that clause is so abused and lead us from a minimalist government to one with its sticky fingers into every part of our lives. I mean, we go from a government meant to handle trade disputes between states to government that forces all citizens to buy insurance.
|
we have law to handle commerce, no need to get federal gov involved in that shit, let states do it. Like the founders intended.
the thing is more conservatives believe in less gov oversite, while more libs believe in more.
A lib thinks, "well if you have TOO much gov, at least *some* of that gov will be doing its job right... if you have NO gov, then none of the gov is doing its job and corporations take over"
but they leave out the part where the gov works for the corporations anyway, so there is no winning with that ideology.