View Single Post
  #74  
Old 11-22-2017, 05:32 PM
JurisDictum JurisDictum is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,791
Default

What I think is going on here is that those women didn't make it, know they are not going to (unless maybe they get a hit of fame off this), and are mad about compromising themselves.

That's ok from my perspective. Them being mad about it. But their anger is misplaced in men and their sexuality. Mick points out -- this is what men do. They try to impress women and get them to consent to sex with them. That's all he did.

So whats the real problem here?

The problem is those women felt like they had to engage in sexual activity with him to gain economic security. Those women feel this way because of how our economy works. It's who you know and there is no generous welfare state waiting for you if you fuck up.

The other problem is that these women blame the god damn patriarchy instead of the economy. Feminists have a big drum circle about how of rich men exploit women (poor/middle women, not rich women) -- and guys get pissed off that LCK was just trying to get laid and women are pissed at him for it.

And so, current internet feminism proves not only irrelevant here -- but destructive to the socialist cause. Divide and conquer. Republicans on one side, Democrats on the other.
Last edited by JurisDictum; 11-22-2017 at 05:38 PM..