Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this is all fake news. First "many" there are only 5 women that have come out and all of them gave him consent.
second none of them were co workers they were going to his room and he was flirting with them, that's why they went there.
third he did NOT show his privates to anyone who didnt say yes. What part of GETTING CONSENT is the problem here? GET CONSENT, STILL LOSE YOUR JOB?!?! what the hell is the matter with libtards these days?!
If they went there, thinking they could promote their carrier by asking for his help, or if they felt that if they said no to him, he would actively try to destroy their carrier, that is ALL on them. First they shouldn't be hanging out with someone only to further their own professional interests. Second if they think he 'might' harm their carrier by saying no, they didnt give him the opportunity to not do that, so its a fantasy they are creating. and third, they were all hanging out with him at comedy clubs and drinking and flirting afterhours so its a perfectly find place for someone to engage in flirtatious sexual activity by ASKING FOR CONSENT.
What you are saying is that if someone has the same carrier as you, you cannot partake in any sexual discussion without certified legal written consent.
Its absurd.
Lor, please stop reading and regurgitating fake lies about someone while you continue to shame them for things they didnt do that the lies convinced you he did.
|
Feminism's problem with Louis C.K. is that he used career opportunity to leverage sex acts. Even though nothing illegal took place, there was a power imbalance caused by the status of Louis C.K. and the opportunity he represented for those young women.
Notice: none this actually has much to do with Men and Women. You have to abstract to a point where you say something like: "Men frequently do this specific thing and usually target women." But the actual problem with what is going on is entirely economic.
Young good looking people are approached for sex often. The implied exchange is career development for sex. Keep in mind -- lots of gay (or sometimes straight) men are approached for sex in exchange career potential...weird how all the sudden the exact same issue is completely different in the eyes of the feminist.
It's about class. And that class is economic class not a male/female dichotomy.
Now all that being said. It's BS that C.K is getting all the flak for something men have done for thousands of years -- like he's doing something uniquely bad that everyone agreed was wrong for a long time. But he's being a good sport about it.
Edit: All the effort and ideas around the concept of "protecting a girls reputation" BTW...are completely sex-negative slut shaming style statements. The idea that your reputation is now bad because you slept with Louis C.K. as a young comedian doesn't need to be encouraged by feminists IMO.