Quote:
Originally Posted by Bellringer
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Confused of why the 4164 number is being overlooked. It appears your assumptions of classic mana per wis/int above and/or below 200 are flawed.
|
I believe they are saying the 4,164 was calculated and tested during Luclin which actually used a formula that increased your mana pool. If using the supposed velious calculation and maintaining that mana cap on items was a 50% cap of your wis/int, then your pool would be lower as well as the cap on items.
Haven't looked into how rock solid that is, or if something is amiss.