I
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bellringer
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is where you lose me. You somehow still want your 4126 number in the convo just because it was posted by a complete rando in a "dev thread" as opposed to much more reasonable evidence pointing towards 4164.
It's these sorts of things that will cause people to oppose you initially instead of looking at your information with an open mind.
PS. Some people will always oppose you due to the salt levels coursing through their veins.
|
My rationale is 4164 was player tested, the original dev page no longer works and we have a copied original post with player comments. I am assuming the 4126 could have been confirmed on the original page and reposted on the copy page.
I am adhmitting the 4164 sounds better, but i can't imagine someone just made up 4126 which is why i am still talking about it.
Hopefully that calms you down?