Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasttimes
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
couldnt find where i bfg'd with you but i can list couple as reference
/GU Derakor the Vindicator in 132s, 175k @1326dps --- A Drakkel Dire Wolf 20k @161dps --- Knapsack 16k @121dps --- Ripqozko 15k @118dps --- Idrinkk 13k @109dps --- Rikyr 12k @92dps --- Trazzle 12k @89dps --- Gatitos 11k @87dps --- Logaluger 11k @85dps --- Jenssen 10k @78dps --- Torstein 10k @75dps
/GU Derakor the Vindicator in 163s, 167k @1026dps --- Knapsack 17k @107dps --- Skew 17k @102dps --- Ripqozko 16k @99dps --- Jenssen 14k @87dps --- A Drakkel Dire Wolf 14k @105dps --- Orna 14k @86dps --- Merkk 12k @78dps --- Trazzle 11k @68dps --- Flippie 10k @64dps --- Morgant 9k @55dps
i mean its like bad rogue dps, thats not horrible considering our utility. im just saying rangers do better then people give them credit for.
|
My point in this thread has always been that rangers aren't bad at all considering their utility. Its an extremely fun and useful class. Played well it's one of those classes that can make a bad group good and a good group great.
There are some who just like to trump up the positives to the point of making it sound like rangers strut around Norrath in some sort of demi-god status, and that's just not the case. That's the price hybrids pay for utility.