Quote:
Originally Posted by soup
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A 767 can hold well over 20,000 gallons of fuel. If you have 20,000 gallons of fuel on top of a skyscraper what would you expect gravity to cause that fuel to do?
And yes, heat will spread through metal like that fairly quickly. You don't think it would take days for the heat to spread pretty thoroughly through the structure, do you?
As far as why it fell down and not sideways, that's pretty simple. Gravity pulls down, not sideways. Why would you expect the building to to topple over sideways when gravity is pulling the weakened structure down, not sideways?
|
Fuck. Shit ass fuck!!! Fuck you and your fucking viewpoints! It's completely inconceivable that an opinion other than my own, derived from the mainstream media and supported by my own grossly expanding ego, could hold any sort of credibility. It's fucking bullshit man, omg, take your meds, put on your tinfoil hat, hide in your nuclear shelter and stfu.
^ That's about the sum of what I've seen of your responses to the differing viewpoints here. You're demanding scientific facts yet offer none to support your own arguments other than broad generalizations. Links to wikipedia do not count, so before you post wikipedia.com/CIRCLES_ARE_ROUND_OMFG - fuck yourself.
I'm not saying that I support a theory of the US government bringing down the towers, but is it that incomprehensible for you to imagine? Really? You're being called a sheep because that's exactly what you sound like. Jumping off the handle at anyone that doesn't support the majority viewpoint. Lashing out with offensive language and insults whilst offering no real substance to the conversation.
Yes, we understand fully that it's inconceivable for you to think that the government might not always be looking out for our best interests and that the rest of us need to "shut the fuck up" because we're conspiracy theorist-reading idiots. Duly noted, sir. I believe you can take a deep breath now.