
10-06-2017, 09:30 PM
|
|
Sarnak
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 327
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It seems to me this could all be solved very simply. When you agree to the terms of the roll, you should have to specify whether or not you are rolling for yourself. This would have no effect on your winning the roll. Why? Because the roll is about avoiding autofire and similar macro clicking issues, nothing else.
So why declare that it's not for you? Because a lot of people who happily help with the fight after may not want to help someone doing it for a friend, or doing it to sell. If they're going to help someone, it seems reasonable that they should get to know who they're ultimately helping.
Maybe I'm missing something, but that seems like the option that will satisfy the most people. Equally important, it would actually be viable (since, as we have to remember, everything about this is "opt-in"), because as part of a valid player-made agreement the GMs could intervene if someone lies.
|
+1
Don’t know if I have ever ran into loramin in game, but his arguments are so damn reasonable. Big fan, big fan.
|
|
|
|