Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
because 9/10 times the guy had it coming because they were 1. a suspect of a crime 2. acted like a criminal and reached for *something*
I do not believe we should expect police to just be automatons that have no right to life and should just wait till they are shot at before they shoot back. That's fucking stupid. They put their lives on the line to protect us and all you do is shit on them because ICE T told you to when you were 9
Now you live in this fantasy world (because you're a good little cuck that sits in his room all day) and thinks that the 1 minuet clip you see on youtube is enough for YOU to be judge jury and executioner.
The liberal agenda against the police is both stupid and totally a fantasy.
What do you want from the police? Seriously? You want more outcomes where they go to jail after shooting someone? That's ironic. They're going through the same court system anyone else goes through, often with a jury, and they are found innocent.
Then liberals cry "ITS RIGGED ITS THE SYSTEM!" when it was a fucking jury of American civilians in a courtroom that said the officer used the right judgment.
Why does pumpernickel take a knee? why do any of the NFL players take a knee? Answer me that. I know whatever reason you think they do, is not the reason they actually do, and I 100% guarantee that whatever reason they took that knee, and whatever reason you think they should, is complete bullshit.
I'm willing to bet zero football players and zero liberals actually know what the law or the polices that the police have to follow when they shoot someone in the line of duty.
I know you dont, poke.
Respect the police, theyre not all good but 1 bad apple doesnt spoil the whole bunch becuse a fat ass woman with pink hair says they do.
|
yes, you are arguing for cops to serve as street executioners. this mostly harms browns.
riddle me this captain tl;dr, did the australian woman deserve to die?