Only you are saying I am saying its successful.
I am not saying they are winning, or not failing, or arguing that news is some great investment and its time to move your stock options to media outlets....
I am simply answering spiders question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spyder73
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
unelected and anointed media does nothing but cover these stories day after day
|
I am not saying that their tactics make them INFINITE MONEY... Im saying it makes them
MORE MONEY than if they printed real informative news, which is why you dont see real, informative news.
Do you get it yet? You are saying I am saying something that I am not, nor am I even implying.
"why is the news about if it bleeds it leads?"
because the demographic that watch the news, or talk about the news, LIKE that type of news...However, The MASSES of people that, watch less news, dont share news or talk about news at all, may not like that stuff, but even if the news printed information that those types of people did like, it wouldn't increase the media outlets viewership, because those people (EVEN if they start watching more news, wont share it) wouldn't share it, because its not something the average person likes to do, (spam social media with links)... so its more profitable to make news that the type of people that share news frantically all over twitter and social networks LIKE to share.