Quote:
Originally Posted by Priceline
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I totally get that the regen is a nice perk but it doesn't change the fact that a non-iksar can still solo all the things an iksar can.
efficiency doesn't equal better, not sure how you came to this conclusion. Here is an easy example, Solo Artist Challenge, only 1 of the 3 listed on the first page is your beloved lizard folk. you probably should get the gm's to correct that mistake cause obviously all 3 must be iksars.. cause you can't play a nec at the top level w/out being an Iksar.
Now please go tell newbie necro's of the non lizard kind to "git gud"
|
I think you are splitting hairs. No one is on a soap box here. Someone asked if it's a worthwhile difference to choose iksar over the other races for a necromancer. It does. Is iksar a more efficient choice? Yes. Is "efficient" = better? Depends on what you are measuring I guess. But I think it's hard to argue that it is not desirable to be more efficient.
Does that mean an iksar can solo anything a non- iksar can't? Well no but the iksar will be more efficient at it. Does that matter enough to steer your hand when picking race? That's up to individual preference