Quote:
Originally Posted by Rilkean
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's some very half assed whining from a san francisco molecular biologist:
1: There are multiple theories of how humans spread throughout the continents and not ONE has been proven yet, not one. There is one strongly supported by the scientific community but even we admit that it is simply an educated guess and nothing more; much different from the big bang theory.
2:
"Some nations live in skyscrapers, some live in mud huts. The reason for this isn't because all humans are equal. Natural selection doesn't create equality."
NATURAL SELECTION / EVOLUTION DOES NOT DENOTE PROGRESS. EVOLUTION IS MOSTLY RANDOM. That is the first thing you learn in evolutionary science. You are a really disgusting racist person, whether or not you admit it.
You have a classic case of Lamarck syndrome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Poverty ("huts", "IQ" (if you even believe standardized testing to be representative of intelligence in the first place)) is an example of soft inheritance. |
Resources =/= evolution
Everyone from native african's to aborigines knew how to construct and build tools, the only reason certain cultures advanced further than other cultures was due to resource allocation, and when certain continents had an abundance of copper, iron, coal, lumber etc. they progressed faster than people living in areas where it's just stone and sand. So it was easier to forge copper weapons and go slay people still using stone, take their land, enslave their people to build better copper weapons, the whole notion of human progress has been built on allocating and warring over resource, and subjugating "inferior" people which were less technologically advanced.