[AzzarTheGod]

I'll do it when I have more mental fortitude. I'm tapped.

And I'm not an idiot. I realize well prepared witness statements for broadcast purposes, and even hiring narrators, and crisis actors I suppose as they call them, do not mean that this is a drill or that real people did not get hurt, nor am I denying that there was an explosion of some serious consequence. If you were listening to the BBC they had just about every witness ready to roll with a perfectly worded primetime statement. Some statements had to be 2 paragraphs long. It all felt a little contrived. It smelled. How do you get so many primetime ready to roll statements within 1 hour of the attack?

I just believe after independent investigation these things never unfold exactly as they say with respect to the casualties.

It usually takes me a couple of years of offhand casual investigation to make a final decision on whether something was the real McCoy. I never take these things at face value, and I am not sure anyone should.

What benefits do you get out of that?