*Example* An enchanter and lvl 40 ranger are in a group. The enchanter leaves to go kill frenzy and the ranger stay at lord. In this instance both camps are not considered held as the ranger could not survive this camp on his own without the enchanter.
Just because the camps are right next to each other doesnt discount the fact that the druid couldnt survive his camp on his own. So if theres 3 camps and 4 people, and it takes 2 people to do 1 of the camps, 1 camp becomes open. you do not need permission to take that open camp.
That is the way Ive always operated here and no one has ever argued against that. Can a GM say otherwise? Because if that is not true then you should really redo that camps, defind post.
__________________
Kateausten
|