Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjerry
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
one is Alan Greenspan. the other one's only substantive campaign promise would have created a program to produce hundreds of millions of Alan Greenspans. Both are of the same ethnicity, which is well-documented as the most ethnocentric in the entire world.
The fact that one said out of the side of his mouth something non-Greenspan doesn't make these people diametrically opposed. The gaze should be large and broad. This is the twofold gaze "perception and sight". It is important in strategy to know the enemy's sword and not to be distracted by insignificant movements of his sword.
Do you also think the Jewish financiers behind Fox News and the ones behind CNN are mortal enemies?
|
That you could think there is meaningful convergence of motives behind the actions of Sanders and Greenspan just shows you are choosing to ignore Sanders' political career. Nothing Sanders did as a mayor or Senator aligned ideologically with Greenspan at all. It's time to stop talking in vague omens and provide details. If you think there's something specific Sanders and Greenspan were aligned on, share it with me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angushjalmur
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
opposed only on the surface. bernie did the communist thing to get donations from stupid entitled college kids (which bought him two mansions btw) and then pulled a pokesan and started endorsing hillary full force. hillary as you know is all about getting money, fucking the little guy, and having total control over people (like greenspan). bernie knew what he was doing. he was meant to appeal to the younglings and amass a fanatic following (youre a perfect example still rooting for him) with his too good to be true pseudo communist slick talk. that way, all those voters would jump on the hillary train once dear leader told them to. many did, but some didnt and basically became null jill stein votes.
The entire establishment was lined up like dominos with hillary up front, each ready to do it's part in hopes of building up enough momentum to catapult her into office, and theres a reason why. all of these people and organizations who control the country would have been enbiggened with hillary as president. she was the dagger that the coup de grace would have been carried out with
|
Mansions? lol. My home is worth more than Sanders'. He's a member of our nation's leadership. I had rich parents.
Oh I see, yet another person who doesn't understand his endorsement of Hillary.
Tell me, do you discount every single Republican cuck who violently opposed Trump, who Trump personally and viciously insulted during the campaign, and then submissively fell into line when he got elected? Why are you okay with these people being a central part of your role model's administration, if you discount Sanders for doing the same thing?