Quote:
Originally Posted by kotton05
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
But but the 7th alt!!
i don't get it either spyder. But here is the kicker....
Aftermath was willing to rotate mobs and work with everyone just like rustle. It wasn't rustle or am afaik who ruined it... surprisingly it was CSG who was unhappy and didn't agree. Then the members complain like it was AM who ruined it. The misinformation is at an all time high. We was close to working it out like adults [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I hope it gets revisited as detoxx is a leader who will work with others np step up CSG swallow that pride. You was gonna get dain PD and a few other really nice targets but wasn't enough!
Plz reconsider csg lets be done with the old ways and make a change |
Sounds like you are badly informed, please don't slander our name like that. We were not happy with the split suggested, and requested some changes, but as far as I know we weren't the difficult party to work with here.
AM didn't ruin it, they just asked for too large a piece of the cake in my mind, and so did another party in the talks. We would've been happy with less cake than on last agreement (of course), but the quality of the cake should not diminish so much that you are doubting if it actually is cake. CSG doesn't want to kill 10 mobs in a week, thats not who we are or how we roll. 2-3 of the nice pieces of cake, and we would've filled our need and happily moved on, but when all we are offered is crusts, then we ask for a different way of distributing said cake. Now one party wanted flat out a size of the cake proportionate to their size (which was never going to happen), and another party wanted to have most of the cake AND all of the toppings, which of course isn't really fair either.
Anyway, think what you like, but CSG wanted to make an agreement here, very very much so - FFA raiding is not for 2017.
Edit: I also haven't really seen any CSG crying about this agreement falling through, anywhere on the forums? If so they are not representing us well.
We knew it was a possibility with the problems outlined above, but surely there is a threshold where an agreement is just too poor to agree to.