Quote:
Originally Posted by Angushjalmur
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hillary helped create the problem in the middle east, what makes you think she would do anything productive?
We don't need to worry about russia, because every claim democrats and the media have made have been thus far unsubstantiated. it's propaganda. the corrupt establishment is freaking out because an outsider just won the presidency and they're saying and doing everything they can to sabotage him, in hopes of replacing him with someone who can be controlled.
If you remember, obama threatened military action against putin if he didnt stop bombing ISIS hotspots. Putin doesn't give a shit about being politically correct, he was trying to solve the problem. that's why we're going after putin. because he was vaporizing the globalist's private army (ISIS) that obama and hillary had huge parts in creating. it has nothing to do with the election, or any potential meddling that no one can seem to provide proof of.
|
It seems like a really good conspiracy theory either way.
Do you think Gary Johnson would have had a better shot at all this?
What if the whole point was to stop either party from getting a candidate that would do anything viable to stop global interests from influencing America?
Putin sure does have a lot to gain / lose by having free reign.
Not all the Islamic ppls / factions Putin is hammering is ISIS.
Not sure if Russia will have success with anything short of genocide. There's a lot of Muslims outside of Syria.. like in Iran and Pakistan Egypt Jordan to keep the blood flowing and the ISIS coffers full. We going to see ISIS 3.0 when Putin declares mission accomplished? Or they get tired of rerolling their guild. Why not make simplistic comparisons to human nature we can all relate too.
I'm woefully uninformed and without access to intel though. So I'm fully speculating.