[Trungep99]

Originally Posted by eadric [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Those are legitimate environmental issues, which are often overlooked in favor of climate change hysteria. I'm all for real environmentalism, from more advanced, cleaner energy sources, to protecting forests, and holding nuclear power companies accountable for their waste products.


Maybe 98% choose to stay between the lines for one reason or another. There are certainly plenty of incentives not to question the status quo. As for those "studies" and the predictions they make, they invariably end up being proven wrong. Read the link I posted for one explanation why they are always wrong.

Or ignore me, and keep cheering for a carbon tax and carbon credits, which will only favor the biggest corporations and peddlers of sophisticated financial instruments (wall st, city of london), to the detriment of their small and medium sized competitors, and all the rest of humanity.

I'll take a gander later. I haven't seen what is said but I do think the basic concept of increased CO2 admissions + the decline of the rain forest can change the atmosphere.