Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thats the problem. By not thinking in terms of right or wrong you will always be stuck in shades of grey.
|
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Syria are bad guys.
|
Does that make ISIS good guys? If not, which guys are worse? Oh Peter Dooky, we're back into those "shades of grey" my willful lobotomy was supposed to wipe out!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh but they have a "secular leader". Bullshit. They are dealing with Iran and Russia. These are not good countries. They are demonstrably bad for as long as we can remember.
|
The alternative is the United States of America. You know, the country where the president who presided over drug dealing to impoverished blacks domestically to bypass congress in funding covert wars is still worshiped as a hero and the greatest post-WW2 leader (triggered?). There are not "good guys".
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Even if Assad wanted to, he couldn't bring any real peace to the region because his country is 70% muslim and clearly, they don't even like him
|
Assad, Saddam and Gaddafi all had pretty solid control over their respective territories before they were destabilized from outside. Your statement above is simply false, and you are in one deep motherfucking slumber if you believe the continuing instability in Syria is an organic outgrowth of an organic Arab Spring.
Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ok so its some globalist faction destabilizing Syria. Tell me what motivation globalists (this term gets misused so much) have that would be any more pertinent than independent US motivations of preventing a coalition of arab nations from toppling the oil-backed US economy?
|
Instability in the middle-east is highly conducive to the goals of (((internationalist financiers))) and American/Europeans with (((dual loyalties))) although it is partially aligned with support of the petrodollar (entangling alliance, and you are not an American if you think it is a good thing). You can disagree or call me tinfoil for believing that these people will follow their "prophecy" even deeper down the rabbit hole, but considering that Zionists are fully planning on the destruction of Israel as a stepping stone to global dominion, I consider them to be globalists. Maybe I'm wrong and Zionists really are just Israeli nationalists and I'm misusing the word "globalism".
shrug