Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So you're saying I should vote for Hillary, so after ww3 starts we can blame democrats instead of Trump? Which is exactly what they'll do no matter what should it start under his watch.. even though we agree it started about 6 years ago.
|
6 years... when Hillary and the Russian Foreign Minister pressed the ceremonial ICBM launch.... I mean (((reset))) button? Odd you say we agree, I just thought of that last month with that button and haven't said anything here in forums, but it seems we do agree. That's what it has seemed to turn into anyway since then. A ceremonial practice run in the least. Then it went into overcharge (lots of button meme's on that) as troops and weapons shifted around the globe I've been watching, alliances formed and proxy-wars (Syria) broke out.
My main concern whether or not it's stoppable, the Russians are now operating a joint military base with Iran. For Iran that's about unheard of, they don't let foreign troops in. Iran does want a big war, it's a belief of their muslim sect. Russia being there means likely there was some regional focused agreement, maybe a price to be paid after Syria. Looks like a campaign to me. Russia even just told us again not to get involved with Syria as they launch the battle for Aleppo. They are suggesting that it could turn into a regional war if we conduct strikes on Syria as they move into Aleppo.
I don't know, it's looking pretty bad. The Russians have no animosity towards the Don, he might be able to at least get the US uninvolved, but then we'll be on our own as we watch the world melt around us perhaps. But even then I doubt we would go unscathed with the likely sleeper-cell activations within our borders.