When an officer is justified in believing that the individual whose suspicious behavior he is investigating at close range is armed and presently dangerous to the officer or to others, it would appear to be clearly unreasonable to deny the officer the power to take necessary measures to determine whether the person is in fact carrying a weapon and to neutralize the threat of physical harm. --Supreme Court, 1968 ruling in response to a 4th amendment case.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...onstitutional/
Stop and frisk is lawful under the constitution. It's left to law enforcement's discretion. HRC and Holt were dead wrong.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]