Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Paul would have received the 2008/2012 Paul treatment. They would have just ignored him like they did his dad. Trump cant be ignored which is the only reason why they havent been able to set up a landslide for Hillary with another dead horse candidate like Romney. She should be ahead by 50 points remember :P
|
I know what you are talking about with Ron, I agree on that. Rand's definitely not Ron, he must get his attitude from his Mother or something. The dude would chase Hillary down a dark ally and beat her senseless with issues lol. He's not even aligned with his Dad on all the issues, Rand's a conservatarian, and I'm sure the private debates against his Dad have driven him to new limits hah.
The difference I think would be that Hillary would be stuck with trying to explain her policies (that Rand does 100x better), Rand would be on the attack most of the time. That's what he does man, and the guy is one of the best political talkers (or talkers in general) I've seen in recent times. That's well known of him. He wasn't at his best at the primaries, I don't know what was going on. I know though that a lot of Repubs did NOT want him there, the guy is hard anti-globalist.