Quote:
Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
yeah but you are behaving like a partisan hack (((Jarnauga))).
Fact-checking a debate is only within the scope of the debate itself. Both parties weren't asked an equal number of hardline questions, with Clinton not being pressured by the moderator (ala Candy Crowley help)
Clinton was given soft-ball topics and chose to dodge and avoid the hard stuff. Her strategy worked, as demonstrated within the scope of the debate you chose to examine (fact-checking).
Too bad the Presidency isn't about whether you declared 4 times or 6 times. God liberals are such little snits. I knew someone would post this.
|
yeah, yeah, same tactic as usual.. "it's not fair it was RIGGED"
which is the best sign that clinton won that one easy