Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The "proof" that Trump was for the war where he said ".... ya... I guess..." when asked about the war on Howard Stern.
That is technically an affirmation, but elsewhere he was against it.
I say what difference does it make what someone without the intel thought about the war. The people who had the real intel like Hillary were for the war. Those who actually believed there was credible intel were rightly for the war. That was most likely the only info the Don had, like the rest of us. Yet he was still dubious on Stern and outright against it according to Hannity and several interviews which took place after the war began.
We of course now know there was no credible intel.
Chaboo is drinking far too much MSM kool-aid.
Hillary looked robotic and scripted in the debate, obv knew the topics in advanced, and Trump still dominated and had more compelling arguments and solutions, even if he struggled to stay on topic. When they got down and dirty, she looked level headed but more wrong than right.
Also have to say Trump is dead wrong about banning 2nd amendment rights using arbitrary lists like "no-fly lists" or "terrorist watch lists". These circumvent the constitution without do-process and are nothing but a foothold to circumvent the 2nd amendment.
|
I'd say Howard Stern is more intelligent than Hannity. LOL , point being mentioning Hannity was hilarious. I get it caters to the average idiot person who watches fox , but the reality is Hannity is a joke when it comes to conservatism. Guy is a blade of grass who just blows wherever the wind blows. No talent, college drop out , who banged on walls.
LOL Hannity has Ted Cruz on his show. That's like the Michelle Bochman of the right LOL
Again, Trump choked hard on that topic. It was evident, and it was pretty funny.
Not as funny though as the " Doesn't have the look", oh! It's Stamina!! LOL