View Single Post
  #56  
Old 09-27-2016, 12:40 AM
R Flair R Flair is offline
Planar Protector

R Flair's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Rustlemania
Posts: 1,058
Default

The "proof" that Trump was for the war where he said ".... ya... I guess..." when asked about the war on Howard Stern.

That is technically an affirmation, but elsewhere he was against it.

I say what difference does it make what someone without the intel thought about the war. The people who had the real intel like Hillary were for the war. Those who actually believed there was credible intel were rightly for the war. That was most likely the only info the Don had, like the rest of us. Yet he was still dubious on Stern and outright against it according to Hannity and several interviews which took place after the war began.

We of course now know there was no credible intel.

Chaboo is drinking far too much MSM kool-aid.

Hillary looked robotic and scripted in the debate, obv knew the topics in advanced, and Trump still dominated and had more compelling arguments and solutions, even if he struggled to stay on topic. When they got down and dirty, she looked level headed but more wrong than right.

Also have to say Trump is dead wrong about using lists like "no-fly lists" or "terrorist watch lists" to remove 2nd amendment rights. These circumvent the constitution without do-process and only offer a foothold towards banning gun-ownership for everyone.
__________________
Pro-Rustler since 1974.
Last edited by R Flair; 09-27-2016 at 12:46 AM..