Quote:
Originally Posted by entruil
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I like to think that a "No-Harm" policy is what we strive to live by.
It's kinda like an election... it can Never be "fair" unless everyone agrees on the rules.
Starting from a place of "Freedom of One's Own Body", there are certain parallels that are inherant.
We are able to decide for Ourselves how we wish to earn/accomplish/proceed.
I am not able to decide for Yourself how you can earn/accomplish/proceed.
therefore,
We both must come to an acceptable standard when mitigating disputes.
I will go in my corner and you can goto your's. We will not be able to hit each other, but just in case, we have an army of like-minds ready to enforce and live prosperously and in peace.
Now Sir, I ask Me!, how Drunk are You!
|
As widespread as war is, as violent as law enforcement are, the amount of violence that is allowed on TV ect i'd hardly say we strive to live by a no harm system.
But assuming we do, It hasnt worked out too well. When you can't kill those who need to be killed, you end up with people like Hillary Clinton running for president