Quote:
Originally Posted by Linksfather
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The staff doesnt care. .. is that bashing?
Braknar gives favoritism.
Sirken makes decisions without all the facts.
Staff rated
|
Well since its been hit on before, I'll say again I wasn't a huge fan of how Braknar handled some live streamers situations. Specifically a certain girl.
If he did more bans of non-sting related rice-trades I'd probably give him a wide berth and 5 star rating because he does seem to do a lot of work before all that drama kicked off. I think he hit the deck since, or possibly lost some steam. Understandably so given the circumstances.
As for Sirken, has done a better job than the rest, and I think that speaks to his longevity and status on the project. As a bonus, he has taken action on rice-trade bans when handed smoking gun information on major deals. Sometimes hitting up to 33 veteran accounts on a single deal. (Since it was mentioned earlier, it was on my mind. And it stands out to me as a huge positive)
Albeit it was somewhat reluctantly, but I don't think anyone likes to ban veteran players over rice-trading for what its worth. And that seems to be the road Braknar has taken by declining player submitted proof in certain circumstances.
With Sirken due to his position, people are going to find things to complain about, but since I am not a top 3 guild raider, I never cared much for the criticism of him.
A lot of the criticism of Sirken seems very overblown, and I am always glad to hear about who's upset now because someone got such and such a call. Because when I read the details its mostly people with an agenda or people venting they lost a call.
Everyone wants to be on the receiving end of a call, that's the nature of the beast.