Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Have you ever looked into Bohm and Pribram's Holographic theory? Have any idea of its relation to simulation theory? Just curious. I find their holonomic view of the brain fascinating although a bunch of mystical bullshit has sprung up around these ideas(like people falling for Sai Baba's BS). I have seen different religious takes on the holographic theory and not just from your typical Buddhist/Hindu/Gnostic views but have read some really interesting breakdowns on this idea of the word and image in Christianity that are too in depth for here.
|
Yeah that's more my take on things, my leading theory. This all originating out of blackhole physics/theory, into quantum theory, and beyond. We very well may be in a type of digital simulator, a computer. Not like ours, a lot more complex, different tech. The whole universe may be just data of sorts on a flat plane or sphere. To our perception it would be without form, it would be void. But introduce light to this plane, to project it like a hologram into an open space, you get an understandable representation. Like what you are looking at around you, it may not really be there, but somewhere else, as is yourself.
And outside of that plane or sphere or *circle, is what is originally real, before our universe came about. That there is far more than just what we see of our universe, while our universe may just be like a facsimile of those things out there, beyond, a simulation model of.
And I think there are even clues through our history. I've brought up the *circle dot, third eye, the other day in this forum (AJ thread I think). You know, with Saturn worshipers and all that, permeating through history to today. That circle with a dot in the center may very well represent the realm we live in quite literally. The circle (or sphere) being the plane while the dot being the hologram projection space. All very rudimentary way to put it, I'm sure it would be more complex than we could describe. But may be in the ballpark.