Quote:
Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'll ask again, do you prefer rape for your daughter or a betrayal of Western values to protect yourself from the savages you were too weak to resist allowing within your borders? These, or God forbid, physical removal of immigrants who belong to cultures that are statistically more likely to be unable to assimilate (includes physical removal of people who do not deserve it), are your options.
|
How does banning the burkini protect anyone? Are we to assume that because muslim women aren't able to wear it, that all muslims, both men and women, will simply opt out of visiting the beach?
Again, this is just passive aggression when direct aggression is needed. This is just people helplessly lashing out.
Assuming that banning burkini's actually does somehow magically prevent muslims from going to the beach and therefore groping women (which is asinine), no I still wouldn't support it. Not unless the law read:
Any muslim found wearing a burkini will be arrested and deported, and also any muslim found anywhere regardless of attire will likewise be deported.
They need to deal with the root of the problem, not the symptoms.
Taking away the rights of the general populus is always done in the name of protection. In this case, they need to protect the people from those who are threatening them, not create a cause for further civil disturbances.