Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
Trump 87
Castle 85
Johnson 79
Stein 28
Clinton 15
I was expecting Castle to be a little higher, but generally tied is about right. Most of the Hillary is foreign and domestic, but probably depending on which day of the week it is for her and who she's talking to. I probably get thrown into her answers as her lies are she's less of a hawk when she is the most pure hawk up there. Castle is less of a hawk which raises my standing with him in this, and brings Trump down a little as he does show a little aspiration for force projection, though may not be a serious response as in will do.
I mean like questions I stared at, the ISIS part. Crap, that's backwards, how about we quit supporting ISIS let alone declare war on them and all that. I mean look at
this NYTimes article, they finally admit we are in a friggen
proxy-war against Russia after squirming away from calling it what it is for so long! Well who's our side then? ISIS! F'ing CIA's army!
Johnson is much of the same as Hillary imo, I think it's the wrong questions around him. He's just another globalist hack, much like Cruz.
edit: you know, in fact thinking about this, I think the web script is a little off. I really should be leading on Castle. Heck I've been in the CP since the beginning, when my state party joined, I've been aligned with most of our nominations over the years on the issues (not always the vote though). I'm wondering if this is a flawed script to pull voters away from Trump onto others like Castle and Johnson, to give a more favorable view of others for you to consider.
Oh and I expanded all the questions btw. There were a lot.