Quote:
Originally Posted by Raev
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You wrote a long inflammatory post about conspiracy theorists, a derogatory label that you (and me, and pretty much everyone else) have mentally assigned to the people who made the video, and your only defense is that because you didn't mention them explicitly that your post was somehow entirely unrelated. This would be a reasonable defense if you had been quoted out of context from a blog or even another thread, but anyone reading this thread will conclude that you were thinking about the video and Daywolf when you wrote this. It kind of reminds me of this |
Defense against what exactly?
Daywolf claims I was using an ad hominem attack. I wasn't and I explained why. Daywolf simply isn't applying the concept correctly.
I was indeed thinking of Daywolf when I wrote it. What gave you the impression that I was denying that? I even stated I was in my previous post.
What's your point? Don't see how the video relates but alrighty.