Quote:
Originally Posted by R Flair
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Democratic socialism (aka. socialism) is too radical for 2016. That is why the establishment went with Hillary. I don't think even the democrats close to center would vote for a socialist over Trump.
|
ehh I disagree. Hillary is a part of the establishment and the establishment is a global socialist movement, the global establishment. Bernie too is a socialist, but he seems independent from the globalist movement on the surface. But really it's two different paths to the same destination, just less direct/certain on Bernie; he could have very well just fell in line if pushed (as he seems to do), and they will certainly push just as they are doing against Brexit atm. All just the same if Jeb or some of the others got in, just a fight over who is going to be the leader of the
NWO and/or how the US/
NAU will fit in. Even if Bernie stagnated the US towards it, it would still allow for forward momentum toward the final goal.
Hillary is very left, just as much as 0bama, just as much as any of them, but they are just playing a part in it as their role. It's a process of phases as Kissinger generally put it (see NWO link, good read as well as the wsj article it's commentating), and they are just following along in the process as a long term goal.
On a side note, I think even Cruz was disingenuous, and this is a funny vid of what he was really saying at Rep-con
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] https://youtu.be/VLkbx5U7EVU